Sports marketeer Chris Woerts accuses De Lotto of rank hypocrisy

Should Dutch sports rely exclusively on De Lotto for external funding?

2016-02-09
Reading time 54 seg
The sponsorship deal between the Royal Dutch Cycling Union (KNWU) and Unibet caused a great uproar. Dutch sports lottery De Lotto, for instance, accused the KNWU of “underming solidarity in Dutch sports,” adding that the new deal would limit opportunities for De Lotto to generate revenue for the Dutch sports sector as a whole.

Noted sports marketeer Chris Woerts, former marketing director of Feyenoord and EPL side Sunderland, strongly disagrees with De Lotto's criticisms. Woerts calls the sponsorship deal a clear “win-win situation,” even going as far as accusing De Lotto of rank hypocrisy.

As it turns out, only 70% of De lotto's contributions to good causes end up benefiting Dutch sports. The other 30% goes to a separate foundation, ALN, which supports generic good causes. Asked for comment Woerts said: “Instead of 100%, De Lotto only provides 70% of its charitable contributions to sports. The nearly omnipresent claim that De Lotto's singular raison d'être is to support sports is evidently false.”

As the charitable contributions of De Lotto are not exclusively dedicated to sports, it appears far from obvious that sports associations and unions should rely exclusively on De Lotto for external funding.

Perhaps, then, a broader discussion – also taking into account De Lotto's structurally declining revenues – on the appropriate sources of funding for Dutch sports is in order.

Related topics:
Leave your comment
Subscribe to our newsletter
Enter your email to receive the latest news
By entering your email address, you agree to Yogonet's Condiciones de uso and Privacy Policies. You understand Yogonet may use your address to send updates and marketing emails. Use the Unsubscribe link in those emails to opt out at any time.
Unsubscribe
EVENTS CALENDAR